Marking waves
All waves can be labeled according to their relative size or extent. Elliot distinguished nine degrees of waves, from the smallest to the time card to the biggest waves he could see on the then existing data. He chose the names listed below to label these degrees, from largest to smallest:(Grand Supercycle) Chief Supercycle(Supercycle) Supercycle(Cycle) Cycle(Primary) Primary cycle(Intermediate) Intermediate,(Minor) Minor cycle(Minute) Minute(Minuette) Second,(Subminuette) Subsekunda.
It is important to understand that definitions are specifically identifiable degrees of waves. For example, the definition refers to an increase in the U.S. stock market since 1932, we are talking about this as a supercycle of subdivision as follows:1932-1937 - the first wave of the degree of the cycle,1937-1942 - the second wave of the degree of the cycle,1942-1966 - the third wave of the degree of the cycle,1966-1974 - the fourth wave of Cycle degree,1974-19? - The fifth wave of Cycle degree.Cycle waves subdivide into Primary waves that subdivide into Intermediate waves that in turn are divided into younger and more junior waves. Using these figures or letters, the commentator can identify precisely the position of full-wave progression in the market, just as in longitude and latitude determines geographic position. To say, "The Dow Jones Industrial Average is at minute wave v A secondary wave 1 of Intermediate wave (3) of the primary wave [5] of wave Cycle Supercycle wave I (V) from the current chief supercycle" must be able to identify certain points of the progression of the market chronology. When indexing the waves there is a number and letter scheme, which recommends a marked degree of progression of waves in the stock market:
Marking ElliottWave power ----------- ---------- Waves on trend waves against the trendSupercycle ------------------ (I) (II) (III) (IV) (V )---------------- - (A) (B) (C)Cycle ----------------------------- I II III IV V --------------- ---------- ABCPrimary ------------------------[ 1] [2] [3] [4] [5 ]---------- ---------[ A] [B] [C]Intermediate --------------------- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5 )------------- --- (a) (b) (c)Minor --------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 ----------- --------------- ABCMinute ------------------------------- i ii iii iv v ------------- --------------- abcMinuette January 2 3 4 5 a b cThe above marking the closest notation proposed by Elliott, and is a traditional or classical, but the list proposed below is more properly used characters:
Marking PretcheraWave power ----------- ---------- Waves on trend waves against the trendGrand Supercycle ---------- [I] [II] [III] [IV] [V ]------------------ [A] [B ] [C]Supercycle ------------------ (I) (II) (III) (IV) (V )---------------- --- (A) (B) (C)Cycle ---------------------------- I II III IV V ---------------- ------------ ABCPrimary ------------------------- I II III IV V ------------------- ---------- ABCIntermediate ----------------- [1] [2] [3] [4] [5 ]----------------- ------[ a] [b] [c]Minor ------------------------- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5 )--------- --------------( a) (b) (c)Minute ------------------------------ January 2 3 4 5 -------------- ----------------- abcMinuette ---------------------------- January 2 3 4 5 ---------------- --------------- abcThe most desirable form for a scientist - usually something like 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, etc., with subscripts denoting degree, but it is - a nightmare to read such notations on the map. The proposed labeling provides quick visual orientation and perception of information. Maps can also use color as an effective tool to identify the degree.
In the terminology suggested by Elliott, the term "cycle" is used as a name denoting a degree of wave and does not imply a cycle in the typical sense. The same thing can be said about the term "primary", which in the past been used freely by theorists in phrases such as "primary swing" or "primary market in which there is a tendency to raise rates." Certain terminology has no effect on the identification of relative degrees, and the authors do not have nothing against editing proposed labeling waves, although we found it most convenient notation waves with figures or letters index. Precise identification of the wave degrees in the "current time" - one of the most difficult moments of the wave principle. Especially in the beginning of the "new wave", the most difficult to decide what degree of wave forms, and to identify its uppercase smaller subdivisions. The main reason is that the wave combinations are not tied strictly to the time spent on the wave passing certain points. Wave-dependent form, which is a function of price and time. Forms are defined by the size and relative position of components, that is located next to the waves. Relativity - one of the provisions of the Wave Principle, which makes the interpretation of real events smart Equilibre. Another provision of the Wave Principle - the variability of forms will be considered later.
Each wave contains one of two functions: the deployment of a plot or a reaction. That is, the wave may promote or further wave of one larger degree or interrupt it. Wave function is defined relative direction. Active or pulse wave trend - every wave, which moves in the same direction as the wave of a greater degree of which it is. Correctional or reactionary wave, or wave against the trend - every wave, which moves in the opposite direction of the waves of one degree more, of which it is. Active waves labeled odd numbers and symbols. Reaction waves marked with even numbers and symbols. All reactionary waves develop in corrective mode. If all the waves would be active and distributed in the motor way, they would not have any need for their differences with the reactionary waves. Indeed, the most active of waves are divided into five waves. However, since then it will be seen as more active waves develop in corrective mode, that is, they are divided into three waves or variety. A detailed knowledge of the design model, you need to before that would see the difference between active and motor function in the manner in this model remains unclear.
All waves can be labeled according to their relative size or extent. Elliot distinguished nine degrees of waves, from the smallest to the time card to the biggest waves he could see on the then existing data. He chose the names listed below to label these degrees, from largest to smallest:(Grand Supercycle) Chief Supercycle(Supercycle) Supercycle(Cycle) Cycle(Primary) Primary cycle(Intermediate) Intermediate,(Minor) Minor cycle(Minute) Minute(Minuette) Second,(Subminuette) Subsekunda.
It is important to understand that definitions are specifically identifiable degrees of waves. For example, the definition refers to an increase in the U.S. stock market since 1932, we are talking about this as a supercycle of subdivision as follows:1932-1937 - the first wave of the degree of the cycle,1937-1942 - the second wave of the degree of the cycle,1942-1966 - the third wave of the degree of the cycle,1966-1974 - the fourth wave of Cycle degree,1974-19? - The fifth wave of Cycle degree.Cycle waves subdivide into Primary waves that subdivide into Intermediate waves that in turn are divided into younger and more junior waves. Using these figures or letters, the commentator can identify precisely the position of full-wave progression in the market, just as in longitude and latitude determines geographic position. To say, "The Dow Jones Industrial Average is at minute wave v A secondary wave 1 of Intermediate wave (3) of the primary wave [5] of wave Cycle Supercycle wave I (V) from the current chief supercycle" must be able to identify certain points of the progression of the market chronology. When indexing the waves there is a number and letter scheme, which recommends a marked degree of progression of waves in the stock market:
Marking ElliottWave power ----------- ---------- Waves on trend waves against the trendSupercycle ------------------ (I) (II) (III) (IV) (V )---------------- - (A) (B) (C)Cycle ----------------------------- I II III IV V --------------- ---------- ABCPrimary ------------------------[ 1] [2] [3] [4] [5 ]---------- ---------[ A] [B] [C]Intermediate --------------------- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5 )------------- --- (a) (b) (c)Minor --------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 ----------- --------------- ABCMinute ------------------------------- i ii iii iv v ------------- --------------- abcMinuette January 2 3 4 5 a b cThe above marking the closest notation proposed by Elliott, and is a traditional or classical, but the list proposed below is more properly used characters:
Marking PretcheraWave power ----------- ---------- Waves on trend waves against the trendGrand Supercycle ---------- [I] [II] [III] [IV] [V ]------------------ [A] [B ] [C]Supercycle ------------------ (I) (II) (III) (IV) (V )---------------- --- (A) (B) (C)Cycle ---------------------------- I II III IV V ---------------- ------------ ABCPrimary ------------------------- I II III IV V ------------------- ---------- ABCIntermediate ----------------- [1] [2] [3] [4] [5 ]----------------- ------[ a] [b] [c]Minor ------------------------- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5 )--------- --------------( a) (b) (c)Minute ------------------------------ January 2 3 4 5 -------------- ----------------- abcMinuette ---------------------------- January 2 3 4 5 ---------------- --------------- abcThe most desirable form for a scientist - usually something like 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, etc., with subscripts denoting degree, but it is - a nightmare to read such notations on the map. The proposed labeling provides quick visual orientation and perception of information. Maps can also use color as an effective tool to identify the degree.
In the terminology suggested by Elliott, the term "cycle" is used as a name denoting a degree of wave and does not imply a cycle in the typical sense. The same thing can be said about the term "primary", which in the past been used freely by theorists in phrases such as "primary swing" or "primary market in which there is a tendency to raise rates." Certain terminology has no effect on the identification of relative degrees, and the authors do not have nothing against editing proposed labeling waves, although we found it most convenient notation waves with figures or letters index. Precise identification of the wave degrees in the "current time" - one of the most difficult moments of the wave principle. Especially in the beginning of the "new wave", the most difficult to decide what degree of wave forms, and to identify its uppercase smaller subdivisions. The main reason is that the wave combinations are not tied strictly to the time spent on the wave passing certain points. Wave-dependent form, which is a function of price and time. Forms are defined by the size and relative position of components, that is located next to the waves. Relativity - one of the provisions of the Wave Principle, which makes the interpretation of real events smart Equilibre. Another provision of the Wave Principle - the variability of forms will be considered later.
Each wave contains one of two functions: the deployment of a plot or a reaction. That is, the wave may promote or further wave of one larger degree or interrupt it. Wave function is defined relative direction. Active or pulse wave trend - every wave, which moves in the same direction as the wave of a greater degree of which it is. Correctional or reactionary wave, or wave against the trend - every wave, which moves in the opposite direction of the waves of one degree more, of which it is. Active waves labeled odd numbers and symbols. Reaction waves marked with even numbers and symbols. All reactionary waves develop in corrective mode. If all the waves would be active and distributed in the motor way, they would not have any need for their differences with the reactionary waves. Indeed, the most active of waves are divided into five waves. However, since then it will be seen as more active waves develop in corrective mode, that is, they are divided into three waves or variety. A detailed knowledge of the design model, you need to before that would see the difference between active and motor function in the manner in this model remains unclear.
No comments:
Post a Comment